An option is a derivative trading product that is best used by investors as a hedging tool providing profit protection and profit enhancement. Although it is a powerful risk management tool, it can also be used effectively as a stand-alone trading vehicle.

Under the proper conditions, options do not have to be paired with stock or another option to be an effective trading tool. To successfully trade naked options, an investor must realize that certain options will fit certain scenarios and certain options will not.

One of the major misconceptions that investors have about options stems from the fact that most do not know how to trade them properly. When they lose money trading them, they feel that there is something wrong with the option. They do not understand that options are on a higher, more sophisticated level when compared to stocks.

Stock trading has fewer variables involved and is therefore easier. No one is saying that the individual investor isn’t smart enough to trade options. The problem is not intelligence; it’s just education and experience. Most investors have not been properly educated in the proper use of options, and even fewer have had any real experience trading them.

One of the biggest problems investors have is this: Even if you buy a call and the stock goes up, you can still lose money. Most investors tend to buy out of the money options at a cheap price. The stock trades up a little, which is the right direction, but the option still loses money and the investor wonders why.

What the investor fails to realize is that in order for the option to be profitable the options delta must out-pace its rate of decay. Implied volatility also plays a key role if the stock does trade up while implied volatility decreases, the options delta must then outperform the decrease in volatility. Remember, when volatility increases, the price of all options goes up. When volatility decreases, the price of all options goes down.

We have categorized options in several ways. One way is by the option’s strike price, and its distance from the stock price. We identified these options as either in-the-money, at-the-money, or out-of-the-money.
In our discussion about trading naked calls and puts, we will identify trading

 
opportunities or situations that fit each of these types of options, for both calls and puts. But it is important to first review the definition of Delta before continuing.

Remember, delta tells you how much the option will move with a similar move in the stock and is given as a percentage. For example, a 33 delta option means that the option will move 33% of the movement of the stock and 70 delta option will move 70%. In-the-money options act like stock. The deeper in the money the calls are, the more they act like the stock. As the call moves deeper and deeper in the money, the calls delta approaches 100 which means it’s price movement will reflect 100% of the stock’s movement. (This is discussed in more detail later in “The Stock Replacement Covered Call Strategy”).

Trading Naked Calls & Puts

In fact, deep-in-the-money options are sometimes even used to replace stock positions. If you look at the charts below, you can see how closely the in-the-money call mimics the upward movement of the stock (2nd quadrant).

Trading Naked Calls & Puts

In the money options are best used for smaller stock movements. The reason is that in-the-money options contain less extrinsic value. The extrinsic value can work against you when purchasing an option because extrinsic value is affected by time decay.

As you wait for your stock movement, the in-the-money option will decay less than either the at-the-money or out-of-the-money options because it has less extrinsic value. The amount of money you lose in time decay must then be made back by additional stock movement.

Obviously, the less you lose in decay, the less the stock has to move for you to be profitable because it has less decay loss to make up for.

This is because an in-the-money call has a high delta and a much higher percentage chance of finishing in-the-money by expiration so they follow the stock more closely.

With less extrinsic value loss to make up for, a smaller movement in the stock will produce a greater profit. For a call example, as you can see in the chart below, the in-the-money produces a profit with the least amount of stock movement. With less extrinsic value, the ITM option has a lower break-even point.

For chart below, stock price = $35.00
 
Strike Price     
Option Price     
Delta     
Breakeven     
Extrinsic Value     
$30     
5.20     
85     
35.20     
$.20     
$35     
1.00     
52     
36.00     
$1.00     
$40     
.30     
20     
40.30     
$.30     
Webster’s Dictionary defines the term strategy as “ 1 a) the science of planning and directing larger scale military operations, specifically (as distinguished from TACTICS) of maneuvering forces into the most advantageous position prior to actual engagement with the enemy b) a plan or action based on this. 2 a) skill in managing or planning, especially by using stratagems b) a stratagem or artful means to some end.

When applying a definition to investing in the market, we want to pay particular attention to the words “maneuvering into the most advantageous position prior to actual engagement” and the words “skill in managing or planning especially by using stratagems.”

Picking a stock or group of stocks is only half the battle. Making the most from the chosen investment opportunity is the other half. This is where your strategy comes in.

The wrong strategy even when applied to the right opportunity can produce increased risk, decreased profits and even potential loss. Therefore, understanding and applying the proper strategy is critical.

The actual selection of an investment opportunity from those offered normally depends on the type and style of research the investor favors and deems necessary.

This selection process, or “investment selection protocols,” is a checklist of different types and pieces of data that are favored by the individual investor. These pieces of data can consist of charts, indicators, oscillators, fundamental analysis, news or even tips.

Each investor has his/her own investment selection protocol. As an investor, once you complete this process and choose your investment opportunity, your strategy takes over. Inherent in the selection of the stock is expectation.

Every investor has some expectation for any chosen opportunity. Therefore a strategy must be selected which best fits those expectations.  

The proper strategy will be the strategy that allows for the highest possible return with the least amount of risk and the best possible protection that can be afforded.

Obviously, since every opportunity will have a somewhat different expectation along with different variables surrounding it, each opportunity should have a different “ideal” strategy. By and large, when choosing a stock to invest in, most investors look to purchase a stock they think will go up. The directional play is as good a place as any to start our discussion of option strategies.

A put option is a contract between two parties (a buyer and a seller) whereby the buyer acquires the right but not the obligation to sell a specified stock or other underlying instrument at a specified price by a specified date.

The seller of a put option assumes the obligation of taking delivery of the stock or other underlying instrument from the buyer should the buyer wish to exercise his option. The put is known as a short instrument which means that the buyer profits from the stock going down.

For the seller to profit, the stock must not move below the strike price plus the amount of money received for the sale of the option. This point is known as the breakeven point and is calculated by adding the call’s strike price to the option’s premium. Obviously, the buyer hopes that the stock price exceeds the breakeven point.

For example, you buy the MSFT January 65 put for $2.00 because you think Microsoft is going to go down. This option gives you the right, but not the obligation to sell the stock at $65.00. In order to obtain this right, you had to spend $2.00. In order for you to make money, the stock would have to trade down below $63.00 by expiration.

This is because the stock has to trade down below the strike plus the cost of the option. If the stock traded down to $60.00, you would make $5.00 because you have the right to sell it at $65.00. However, because you paid $2.00 for the put, you must subtract that from your $5.00 profit for a total profit of $3.00. You have just made $3.00 on a $2.00 investment. Not a bad return.

The buyer of the put has limited risk and unlimited potential gain. His risk is limited only to the amount of money he spent in purchasing the put. His unlimited potential gain comes from the stocks unlimited downside potential.

The seller, on the other hand, has limited potential gain and unlimited potential loss. The seller can only gain what he was paid for the put. The unlimited risk comes from the stock price’s ability to decline during the life of the contract.

For example, if a seller sold the MSFT January 65 put for $2.00, he is giving the buyer the right to sell 100 shares (per contract) of MSFT to him at $65.00 per share at any time until the option expires.

If MSFT declines and trades down to $55.00, the seller would realize a $10.00 loss less the amount he received for the sale of the option ($2.00), for a net loss of $8.00. Meanwhile, the buyer would realize a $10.00 profit less the amount he paid for the option ($2.00), for a net gain of $8.00 per contract.

If MSFT were to trade up to $75.00, the seller would realize a $2.00 profit (the amount of money he was paid from the buyer). Meanwhile, the buyer would only lose what he paid for the option ($2.00). The seller is obligated to take delivery of the stock from the buyer at the strike price regardless of the present market price of the stock. This is why the seller receives premium for the sale.

Again, the following graphs are called parity graphs. They are intended to show you your option’s profit and loss at expiration (when they are trading at parity: i.e. when they are trading without intrinsic value). The first graph shows a put purchase and the second shows a put sale. The graphs show the amount of your expenditure (in the case of a purchase) or the amount you have received (in the case of a sale) and the dollar price of the stock where you would breakeven.

Using the fictitious stock XYZ below, make note of where the stock needs to be at expiration in order for you to be profitable, and how the premium paid (in the case of a purchase) or the premium received (in the case of a sale) affects your profitability.

Also notice the difference in the profit potential between a purchase of the option as opposed to a sale of the option. Lastly, it is important to note the unlimited potential risk inherent in the sale of an option, compared to the fixed risk of an option purchase.

Put Option

Parity – When we discuss parity in terms of options, we say that parity is the amount by which an option is in the money. Parity refers to the option trading in unison with the stock. This also means that parity and intrinsic value are closely related. When we say that an option is trading at parity, we mean that the option’s premium consists of only its intrinsic value.

For example, if Microsoft was trading at $53.00 and the January 50 calls were trading at $3.00, then the January 50 calls are said to be trading at parity. Under the same guidelines, the January 45 call would be trading at parity if they were trading at $8.00. So, parity for the January 50 calls is $3.00 while parity for the January 45 calls is $8.00

Now if these calls were trading for more than parity, the amount (in dollars) over parity is called ‘premium over parity.’ Thus, the term ‘premium over parity’ is synonymous with extrinsic value, which was discussed above.

If the stock is trading at $53.00 and the January 50 calls are trading at $3.50 then we would say that the calls are trading at $0.50 over parity. The $0.50 represents the premium over parity that is also the amount of extrinsic value. The $3.00 is the amount of intrinsic value or parity.

The term time decay is defined as the rate by which an options extrinsic value decays over the life of the contract.

This concept can be illustrated by the charts below.

Parity

Volatility is defined as the degree to which the price of a stock or other underlying instrument tends to move or fluctuate over a period of time.

Implied Volatility is a value derived from the option’s price. It indicated what the market’s perception of the volatility of the stock or underlying will be during the future life of the contract.

A stock that has a wide trading range (moved around a lot) is said to have a high volatility. A stock that has a narrow trading range (does not move around much) is said to have a low volatility.

The importance of volatility is that it has the single biggest effect of the amount of extrinsic value in an option’s price. When volatility goes up (increases), the extrinsic value of both the calls and the puts increase. This makes all the option prices more expensive. When volatility goes down (decreases), the extrinsic value of both the calls and the puts decrease. This makes all of the option prices less expensive.

As stated earlier, a call option is a contract between two parties (a buyer and a seller) whereby the buyer acquires the right, but not the obligation, to purchase a specified stock or other underlying instrument, at a predetermined price on or prior to a specified date.

The seller of a call option assumes the obligation of delivering the stock or other underlying instrument to the buyer should the buyer wish to exercise his option.

The call is known as a long instrument, which means the buyer profits from the stock going up, and the seller hopes the stock goes down or remains the same. For the buyer to profit, the stock must move above the strike price plus the amount of money spent to purchase the option.

This point is known as the breakeven point and is calculated by adding the strike price of the call to its premium. While the buyer hopes the stock price exceeds this point, the seller hopes that the stock stays below the breakeven point.

The buyer of the call has limited risk and unlimited potential gain. His risk is limited only to the amount of money he spent in purchasing the call. His unlimited potential gain comes from the stock’s upside growth potential.

The seller, on the other hand, has limited potential gain and unlimited potential loss. The seller can only gain what he was paid for the call. His unlimited risk comes from the stock price’s ability to rise during the life of the contract.

The seller is responsible for delivering the stock to the buyer at the strike price regardless of the present market price of the stock. This is why the seller receives premium for the sale. It is compensation for taking on this risk.

For example, if a seller sold the MSFT January 65 call for $2.00, he is giving the buyer the right to buy 100 shares (per contract) of MSFT from him for $65.00 per share at any time until the option expires.

If MSFT rallies and trades up to $75.00, the seller would realize a $10.00 loss less the amount he received for the sale of the option ($2.00). Meanwhile, the buyer would realize a $10.00 profit less the amount he paid for the option ($2.00).

If MSFT were to trade down to $55.00, the seller would realize a $2.00 profit (the amount of money he was paid from the buyer). Meanwhile, the buyer would only lose what he paid for the option ($2.00).

The following graphs are called parity graphs. They are intended to show you your option’s profit and loss at expiration (when they are trading at parity: i.e. when they are trading without intrinsic value). The first graph shows a call purchase and the second shows a call sale. The graphs show the amount of your expenditure (in the case of a purchase) or the amount you have received (in the case of a sale) and the dollar price of the stock where you would breakeven.

In this example, we use the fictitious stock XYZ. Please make note of where the stock needs to be at expiration in order for you to be profitable, and how the premium paid (in the case of a purchase) or the premium received (in the case of a sale) affects your profitability.

Also notice the difference in the profit potential between a purchase of the option as opposed to a sale of the option. Lastly, it is important to note the unlimited potential risk inherent in the sale of an option, compared to the fixed risk of an option purchase.

Parity

Premium is the total amount of money (price) you pay for an option. So, if the Microsoft (MSFT) May 65 calls cost you $1.50 then the $1.50 is the amount of the premium of the option.

The total price of an option (premium) consists of two components. Those two components are intrinsic value and extrinsic value.

Please view charts below for option price (premium) examples.

Premium

Intrinsic value, also called parity, is the amount by which an option is in the money. In the case of a call, the intrinsic value is equal to the present stock price minus the strike price. In the case of a put, the intrinsic value is equal to the strike price minus the present stock price. Only in-the-money options have intrinsic value. Out-of-the-money options have no intrinsic value.

For example, with MSFT trading at $65.00, the MSFT January 60 calls will have $5.00 of intrinsic value. If the MSFT January 60 calls were trading at $5.70, then $5.00 of that premium would be intrinsic value.

At the same time, the MSFT January 70 put will also have $5.00 of intrinsic value. So, if the MSFT January 70 puts were trading for $5.70, then $5.00 of that premium would be intrinsic value.

Please view charts below for intrinsic value examples.

Premium

Extrinsic value is defined as the price of an option less its intrinsic value. In the case of out-of-the-money options, the option’s entire price consists only of extrinsic value. Extrinsic value is made up of several components, with the largest being volatility.

 

In the examples above, if the MSFT January 60 calls were trading at $5.70 and $5.00 of that was intrinsic value, then the remainder ($.70) is extrinsic value. The same also holds true for the January 70 puts. If they were trading at $5.70 and $5.00 of that was intrinsic value, then the rest ($.70) is extrinsic value.

Please view charts below for extrinsic value examples.

Premium

An option can be described by its strike price’s proximity to the stock’s price. An option can either be in-the-money (ITM), out-of-the-money (OTM), or at-the-money (ATM).

An at-the-money option is described as an option whose exercise or strike price is approximately equal to the present price of the underlying stock.

For instance, if Microsoft (MSFT) was trading at $65.00, then the January $65.00 call would an example of an at-the-money call option. Similarly, the January $65.00 put would be an example of an at-the-money put option.

Please view charts below for at-the-money option examples.

 
 

Difference between In the money (ITM), out of the money (OTM), or at the money (ATM).

An in-the-money call option is described as a call whose strike (exercise) price is lower than the present price of the underlying. An in-the-money put is a put whose strike (exercise) price is higher than the present price of the underlying, i.e. an option which could be exercised immediately for a cash credit should the option buyer wish to exercise the option.

In our Microsoft example above, an in-the-money call option would be any listed call option with a strike price below $65.00 (the price of the stock). So, the MSFT January 60 call option would be an example of an in-the-money call.

The reason is that at any time prior to the expiration date, you could exercise the option and profit from the difference in value: in this case $5.00 ($65.00 stock price – $60.00 call option strike price = $5.00 of intrinsic value). In other words, the option is $5.00 “in-the-money.”

Using our Microsoft example, an in-the-money put option would be any listed put option with a strike price above $65.00 (the price of the stock). The MSFT January 70 put option would be an example of an in-the-money put.

It is in-the-money because at any time prior to the expiration date, you could exercise the option and profit from the difference in value: in this case $5.00 ($70.00 put option strike price – $65.00 stock price = $5.00 of intrinsic value. In other words, the option is $5.00 “in-the-money.”  

Please view charts below for more in-the-money option examples.

Difference between In the money (ITM), out of the money (OTM), or at the money (ATM).

An out-of-the-money call is described as a call whose exercise price (strike price) is higher than the present price of the underlying. Thus, an out-of-the-money call option’s entire premium consists of only extrinsic value.

There is no intrinsic value in an out-of-the-money call because the option’s strike price is higher than the current stock price. For example, if you chose to exercise the MSFT January 70 call while the stock was trading at $65.00, you would essentially be choosing to buy the stock for $70.00 when the stock is trading at $65.00 in the open market. This action would result in a $5.00 loss. Obviously, you wouldn’t do that.

An out-of-the-money put has an exercise price that is lower than the present price of the underlying. Thus, an out-of-the-money put option’s entire premium consists of only extrinsic value.

There is no intrinsic value in an out-of-the-money put because the option’s strike price is lower than the current stock price. For example, if you chose to exercise the MSFT January 60 put while the stock was trading at$65.00, you would be choosing to sell the stock at $60.00 when the stock is trading at $65.00 in the open market. This action would result in a $5.00 loss. Obviously, you would not want to do that.

Please view charts below for out-of-the-money option examples.

 

Difference between In the money (ITM), out of the money (OTM), or at the money (ATM).

A call option gives the buyer the right but not the obligation to buy a specific security at a specific price by a specific date. It’s a way of “locking in” the purchase price of the stock for a period of time.

A put option gives the buyer the right but not the obligation to sell a specific security at a specific price by a specific date. It’s a way of “locking in” the sales price of a stock for a period of time.

The specific date is known as the contract’s expiration date. On or prior to the expiration date the holder of the option contract has the right to “exercise” the option.

The term exercise means the process by which the buyer of an option converts the option into a long stock position in the case of a call or a short stock position in the case of a put.

The term assign or assignment means the process by which the seller of an option is notified of the buyer’s intention to exercise.

Buyers of options exercise. Sellers of options are assigned.

The strike price or exercise price is defined as the price at which the holder has the right to buy (for a call) or sell (for a put), the underlying security. Strike prices are quoted in dollars, i.e. May 50 calls means May $50.00 strike calls.

There are several other important terms in an option contract:

A long position is defined as any position which will theoretically increase in value should the price of the underlying security increase. Vice versa, the position will theoretically decrease in value should the underlying security decrease.

The buying of stock, the buying of a call, or the sale of a put all constitute a long position.

Two kinds of Options are Calls and Puts

A short position is defined as any position which will theoretically increase in value should the price of the underlying security decrease. Vice versa, the position will theoretically decrease in value should the underlying security increase.

The selling of stock, the selling of a call, or the buying of a put all constitute short positions.

Two kinds of Options are Calls and Puts

The “option class” identifies the specific underlying security the option is written on. The “option series” describes the expiration month and strike price. As an example, let’s use the Microsoft (MSFT) May 65 calls.

MSFT is the option class. May 65 call is the option series. May is the expiration month and 65 is the strike price.

Let’s try one more. How about the Home Depot January 35 puts? Home Depot (HD) is the option class. January is the expiration month and 35 the strike price.

All stocks and options are identified by symbol. We have discussed how the stock itself has a symbol (stock symbol HD = Home Depot, while MSFT = Microsoft.)

Options have symbols too. These symbols are standardized for all exchange traded (listed) options. A different letter identifies each specific month’s call or put. The chart below shows which letters coincide with which month’s calls and which month’s puts.

Month            
      Calls      
      Puts      
January            
      A      
      M      
Febraury            
      B      
      N      
March            
      C      
      O      
April            
       D      
       P      
May            
       E      
       Q      
June            
       F      
       R      
July            
       G      
       S      
August            
       H      
       T      
September            
       I      
       U      
October            
       J      
       V      
November            
       K      
       W      
December            
       L      
       X      

Following the month symbol is the strike price symbol. A letter represents each different strike price. These strike prices are also standardized for all listed options, as follows:

A = 5           
H = 40           
O = 75           
V = 12.5           
B = 10           
I = 45           
P = 80           
W = 17.5           
C = 15           
J = 50           
Q = 85           
X = 22.5           
D = 20           
K = 55           
R = 90           
Y = Not Assigned           
E = 25           
L = 60           
S = 95           
Z = Not Assigned           
F = 30           
M = 65           
T = 100           
G = 35           
N = 70           
U = 7.5           

For example, let’s look at this symbol HD GF:

           HD is the stock symbol that represents Home Depot
           G signifies the month and type which is July calls
           F indicates strike price that is 30

What is an Option?
An option is a traded security that is a derivative product.

By derivative product we mean that it is a product whose value is based upon or derived from the price of something else. Since we are talking about stocks, a stock option is based upon, among other things, the price of the underlying stock.

There are also options on other traded securities such as currencies, indexes and interest rates, but here we will limit our discussion to stock options, or options based on stocks.

A distinguishing factor of an option is that is a depreciating asset in the sense that it has a limited life, and has to be used before the date on which it expires. As time goes by, the option loses value as it moves closer to its expiration date

When we speak of options in terms of volume, we refer to contracts. Each stock option contract is equivalent to 100 shares of stock. When we talk about two contracts, we are talking about 200 shares, 10 contracts; we are talking about 1,000 shares, 75 contracts 7500 shares and so on.

Amount of Shares     
   Equivalent Amount of Option Contracts
100
1
200
2
1000
10
7500
75
15000
150
50000
500
100000
1000
NOTE: It is important to understand the dollar cost of options before actually trading them. When an option is quoted at $1.00 per contract, the investor must realize that the $1.00 represents a price of $1.00 per share, not per contract. Remember that each contract is worth 100 shares. This means that if you were to buy one option contract at a quoted price of $1.00, your total cost will be $100.00 (1 contract x $1.00 per share x 100 shares per contract). If you were to buy 10 contracts for $1.50 per contract, your total cost will be $1500.00. Use the formula below when calculating total dollar cost of the option.
Total Dollar Cost of Trade = Number of Contracts x Price per Contract x 100

Option contracts are literally a sales agreement between two parties. The two parties are the buyer (or holder) and the seller (or writer). When you buy an option contract you are considered to be long the option. When you sell an option contract, you are considered to be short the option. This, of course, is assuming you had no previous position in the said option.

In an option contract, although it seems as though the buyer and seller must be tied together, they are not. You see, the buyer doesn’t really buy from the seller and the seller doesn’t really sell to the buyer.

In reality, an organization called the OCC or Options Clearing Corporation steps in between the two sides. The OCC buys from the seller and sells to the buyer. This makes the OCC neutral, and it allows both the buyer and the seller to trade out of a position without involving the other party.

In today’s market environment, the best remedy for this situation is for you to get more involved in your own investing decisions.

The problem is that most individual investors do not have the knowledge, resources, or time to spend doing their own research, stock selection, execution, and position management.

The development and expansion of the internet has solved part of this problem in that the internet now provides timely information and resources, right at the fingertips of the individual investor.

Earnings reports, income statements, balance sheets, charts, graphs, research, chat rooms, and even CEO video conferences are easy to obtain online. Now, investors have all the tools necessary to make their own decisions.

However, for many the problem still exists. Why? Because, all the tools in the world are no good to you, if you don’t know how and when to use them. The truth of the matter is that most investors are not qualified or properly trained to interpret the use of these tools, and are therefore ill equipped to use them in making their own investment decisions.

So now what should investors do? The answer is to find someone to help you help yourself. Not to make your decisions for you, but to assist you in making your investment decisions and to help educate you as to the `how` and `why. `

You need to become more involved, and the first step in the involvement process is education.

Education is the key to successful investing for the individual investor in the market of the future.

All of us who invest in the stock market know that there are three possible outcomes after we make a stock purchase.

First, the stock can go up and this is generally a good outcome.

Second, the stocks can go down and this is usually a bad outcome.

Third, the stock can go nowhere – which is also generally a bad outcome.

It is bad because not only could you have put that money to use in something with less risk that might have produced a return, but you also incurred commission costs on the way in and out which added to your loss.

So, we see that there are three things that can happen when you take on a new stock position, and two of them are bad.

Now, what if we tell you that by employing a certain strategy correctly, you can improve your chances dramatically?

Instead of having two of three scenarios possibly go wrong, you would have two of three scenarios that could go right. And, the third scenario, the bad one, wouldn’t be nearly as bad.

It can happen by using just one of the many strategies involving teaming stocks with options.

Sound interesting?

Great, but let’s start at the beginning and build a solid foundation first.

For more Information about option trading, please click here:  Options University

How many of you out there think that the market is performing well?

How many think the market is performing poorly?

And how many feel the markets performance is neutral?

Actually none of these answers is correct. You see, the market does not perform, you do. You perform!

Sometimes you perform well, and other times you do not perform so well. The market doesn’t perform, it moves. It moves up, it moves down and it moves sideways.

It moves along like anything else that travels in a business cycle. If the market did perform, then you would only be able to make money in an up market.

As you know, it is possible to make money in a down market, and even in a stagnant market. Thus it stands to reason that the market simply moves and you react to it. So, let’s talk about your performance. You have two ways that you can perform, directly and indirectly.

Directly, you pick your own stocks. Indirectly, someone else picks your stocks for you, whether it is your broker or a fund manager.

In the latter case, the fact that you chose someone else to pick the actual stock does not mean that the responsibility of a loss is theirs. After all, it was you who chose them.

In the end, it is you and you alone who are responsible for your performance. Consequently, it is your responsibility to become an educated investor.

Years ago, individual investors didn’t have to worry about who was managing their money. Now, things have changed as poor returns from money managers and investment firm scandals have shaken our confidence in these ‘professionals.’

To get a better look at what lies ahead, you have to go back and look at what transpired to get you to where you are now. From there, maybe a clearer path into the future will become visible.

During the Great Bull Market of the 1990’s, many investors, like you, entered the market and reaped the returns of the largest bull market in history.

Everyone, it seemed, made incredibly high rates of return. The market’s incredible, unprecedented move appeared to make geniuses of us all – but in actuality, it masked some major flaws with many industry professionals. It also created a misconception in the general public that all market professionals were experts.

Suddenly, the bubble burst and those flaws were exposed.

Not only did we find out that most of those experts possessed more luck than skill, but we also discovered that some had been cheating us out of our hard earned savings.

Many investors were discouraged with these market developments, and to make matters worse, many had lost significant amounts of money. Not to mention, the prospect of regaining these losses seemed slim to uncertain, at best.

Furthermore, the very people we normally looked to for help in retrieving these losses either lacked the talent to recover them or had lost enough of our trust and confidence that we wouldn’t even entertain the thought of letting them try.

For more Information about option trading, please click here:  Options University

Years ago, I lost my mind and decided to day-trade commodities. I studied all the books and did what was then called “paper trading”. I was amazed at how well my system worked. Out of 100 paper trades, I had an 82% win ratio! I started to think of all that I could do with the winnings from my system. Was it the Holy Grail I had discovered?
 
I asked a friend of mine to also paper trade my system and he got a 73% win ratio! We were giddy with premature greed. After these results, I decided to get my feet wet and start out trading a small account.
 
I strictly followed my system and was shocked to see it turned upside down. What yielded steady profits on paper turned to steady losses in my trading account. It was an eye opener as I later found out that floor traders were the variable that I couldn’t include in my algorithm. I was mad as hell. I felt like a young boy sodomized by Gordon Gecko. All the time in developing and testing my system was for nothing because I didn’t understand how the “real world” of trading commodities worked. Immediately, my practical lesson in financial market cynicism drove me out of trading. I thought I had prepared well but my belief was based on ignorance.
 
However, in the past few years, more and more exchanges have moved to computer trading and this has helped to take out the mystery variable of the floor traders. However, maybe the game has just shifted to other insider manipulations. But there is a big difference between now and then.
 
I recently started trading stock options after a year of study and paper trading. Today, the tools for analysis are free whereas they were expensive before. Moreover, many of the insider pro traders and market makers who were rifted out by the computers have leveraged their experience to form businesses to help teach and train prospective traders. Companies like Options University offer a constant stream of online courses, seminars, webinars and mentoring that is on a whole other level that existed just a decade ago.
 
One of the best free tools I have found is paper trading using Think or Swim.
They allow paper trading with their complete platform and the most valuable asset is their traders who are available online or on the phone to answer questions. Think or Swim’s  wisdom in helping to develop interested, educated and successful traders is shown in their open sharing of knowledge that had formerly cost big bucks. As a matter of fact, having access to the platform and the traders has been a real accelerator in developing not only the expertise but the confidence to move from paper trading to actual live trading. And, if I am successful, they make more money.
 

So what happened with my system this time? So far, the trading experience has been what one would hope for. I am pleasantly surprised with what my system has produced so far but I can say that the tools and support are fantastic. The whole experience has a different feel; much more professional and pro-trader.

Hoodwinked. Jerked around. Bamboozled. Fooled. Lied to. Call it what you want but it appears that the financial institutions have taken a big page out of the Marketers Handbook. Spin. Spin. Spin. What is white can be made to look black-or at least gray. What is is is what it is! Doubletalk meant to distort and persuade. Garbage in….garbage out. And so it appears to be with today’s financial news environment. It’s all a big wink between the vested interest groups. And, my friends, in the end, its caveat emptor. The information is out there and it ultimately depends on you to pull the trigger on which investments to make.
 
As a trader who leans heavily on the signals produced by technical analysis, I have found that recently there has been an uncommon de-linking (is that a word?) of what technical analysis is signaling. What is suddenly changing the signals? To me, it appears that reports or the talking heads supposedly presenting unbiased opinions (yeah, right) are really moving the current neurotic markets. Maybe it’s a coincidence or maybe not.
 
What if oil and housing were put back into the inflation formula? We might have inflation in near double digits and a panicked world economy leaving millions unemployed and spirits dragging. My point being that what matters is what people believe a statistic to mean. And it has been working. Bond prices, interest rates are based on an inflation factor as designed by those who benefit from how it is designed. We live with it and accept it. But, in all honesty, I’d rather be lied to than see the pain and suffering the truth would cause.
 
And then I begin to think: Could it be that it is possible to drive markets through the manipulation of the collective psyche? After all, money is just digits and backed by perception only. A financial system based on collective agreement and nothing more. If that is the case, lie to me and I will learn to listen much more carefully and pay less attention to what I used to think was objective information. Random walk my posterior. I will become a liar so I can play the system. Thus, the real threat: we all accept lies as truth.
 
If you think this isn’t possible, think of the dark genius that dwells in the dungeons of the IRS code designers. A financial chess game between some of the best and most devious minds that money can buy against the average Joe and Jane. You don’t think that same advantage doesn’t exist with the financial institutions? Anybody who can design and implement a “voluntary tax” system that has trillions of dollars voluntarily pouring into the coffers of corrupt governments can easily find a way to have the public “voluntarily contribute” to the coffers of the vested financial institutions.
 
O.K. maybe this is a little over the top, but it might just be like boiling a frog. Put him in tepid water and slowly turn up the heat. If done slowly enough, the frog doesn’t feel the life threatening changes and ends up hard boiled without even making a croak. I, for one, am feeling the heat.
Grab your Dramamine. The VIX is rockin and rollin.
In this volatile market, many traders may feel that it’s probably most prudent to stand on the sidelines and stay out of the uncertainty. But option traders know that volatility means opportunity. Stock options offer such a variety of strategies and combination of strategies that even the rainiest of days can bring sunshine to the knowledgeable (lucky?) option trader. Here’s a combination of option strategies to consider.
 
Recently, despite the spate of bad news (subprime, oil & food prices) the fear index-the VIX-has given off signals of increased optimism (the recession; what recession?) But to some, there still appears to be some black clouds and a hurricane of financial spinning. So, the market is in an ambiguous state. But certain stock options strategies thrive in a market that can’t make up its mind.
 
If a trader feels that a particular underlying stock will not move much-either up or down- money can be made on premium collection (writing calls or puts). But a particular stock doesn’t live in a vacuum. Therefore, a key thing to consider is the current market sentiment and momentum. If the under-lying is a strong company in an out-of-favor sector, chances are that the stock will not move much if the market is flat. On the other hand, if the market appears to want to move up (decreasing VIX) there is a chance the underlying stock will also move up-as will in-the-money options. Although the move may not be strong there may be a tendency to move up along with the market. In this case-as we find ourselves today-a good option strategy is called a Bull Put Credit Spread.
 
This strategy is described by its name. Bull means that the sentiment is bullish. Put means that a put will be used and Credit means that the Put will be sold (written) for a premium, which creates a credit in the trader’s account. The thought behind the strategy is that there is a greater possibility that the underlying price will move up-albeit moderately; nothing to get excited about. That means that the probability of a written Put going into-the-money and being assigned is probably less than that of a call moving into-the-money. To protect against a big move in contra to the strategy, an out-of-the-money Put can be purchased. If all goes well, even if the underlying moves up in sympathy with the spirit of optimism being demonstrated by the VIX, the Put will not be assigned and the premium can kept after expiration.
 
The same holds for the reverse situation. If the VIX is going up indicating increased fear of a down market, a Bear Call Credit Spread can be used. In this situation, a Call is written and an out of the money call purchased. The idea is that there is a greater probability of the market going down and the Short Call not being assigned and the premium kept upon expiration.
 
In both situations, other factors need to be considered such as any current news that can affect the price of the underlying and any other technical indicators usually used to make a decision on a potential trade.



Copyright © 2004 - 2008 by Options University™ All Rights Reserved Site designed by KillerDesign.com